Windows 7 gaming benchmarks

In x86, they aren't always exactly 4 bytes. In x64 they aren't 8 bytes long, either! Running Vista64 since day one, and Windows 7 for a while, I must say internally both systems look similiar. It does not take a rocket scientist to guess MSFT would never release such a dud like XP64 again - it's been overdone can you say that? XP 64 ain't a dud, it's a necessity of life for some of us who actually wants newer than 3yr old hardware, and take advantage of the hardware.

The maximum limit of ram is First off any real online PC Gamer who hasn't done it already has found out that Punkbuster doesn't exactly work online for Win7 without tricking the Services options.

Not news since this was the story on Vista, only story is the customers demanding the developers to get some drivers and compatibility. The drivers aren't exactly out or have not been polished, so you will still have some performanc. While the beta stumbles in a couple of cases, overall it performs within a few percentage points of Windows XP, actually outrunning XP in multiple benchmarks.

Since a game is almost the canonical exclusive mode task, the OS should add as little overhead as possible, with as many cycles as possible going the the CPU and GPU. If one version of Windows had a lot higher performance than another for gaming, that'd be more suggestive of a bug or driver issues in the slower version.

I run Win 7 on a laptop I have with 1. It works just fine. I didn't bother to benchmark anything, but a clean install of Win7 booted faster and was more responsive than a clean install of XP on the same machine, as far as I could tell. Of course, this is just my personal experience. I'm sure someone else will have another story to tell. Slashdot is a fairly heavy-traffic site. Maybe you go into work everyday and don't expect to get paid, but some people like getting money. From them to XP Now jump forward eight years instead and look at the difference, eight years on from XP and what have we got?

Next to nothing. I looked at every graph on the page and they are all within a reasonable margin of error, especially in the absence of certain details i. Was Windows 7 running or bit?

There's nothing there that'll make gamer's go "OOHhh It's more like "Well, if I do get lumped with Windows 7, hopefully it won't be much worse than my existing, well-configured, XP install".

What the hell have they been doing? They haven't even bothered to comply with most of the legal demands on them in that time. Alpha, beta, fine - I expect it to be flaky. In fact, I expect all sorts of debugging code and slagging the disk to death while it churns through buckets of debugging data so they can actually fix real-world problems. However, it builds on Vista drivers which, despite much fuss, are pretty well established now.

The new features are basically plug-ins to the existing systems, not massive rewrites of critical code. This all leads me to believe that Windows 7 is a Vista Service Pack, to all intents and purposes. So what the hell were they working on for those 8 years of development with one of the largest software development teams in the world?

The general sentiment and tone of your comment is exactly the same of when XP was getting ready to come out. Everyone at Slashdot swore left and right that XP was bloated to hell, that it'd run too slow, and nobody would buy it, and it would signal the downfall of Microsoft.

The interface so horrible that Joe Sixpack was finally going to wake up and switch to Linux. If not the interface, then product activation would. No, Win2k was their last great OS, and it can't possibly get any better than that. Not for me. I didn't think it was a good one at the time mainly because of system requirements but it changed an awful lot. And it did it in such a way that it was soon on every computer. That happened in a handful of years too. I'm not so sure I could have said that the jump itself from to XP was so massive - I still get people who bring me laptops with There was also significant breakage for very little reward.

Suddenly, everything needed new drivers to be rewritten, which often meant new hardware, or unsupported configurations. Read this paragraph to yourself again. So I've got to download, install and test new drivers to make all the hardware that always used to work continue to work, in the process obsoleting quite a lot of perfectly good hardware into the bargain because nobody read: manufacturers who have financial incentive to release "Vista" versions of the hardware can be bothered to make a Vista driver.

And Vista drivers provide what advantage? Possibly better security with some extremely crap drivers but I haven't seen evidence of that. Significant breaka. Nothing to do with any particular size, but has been associated with sub-atomic scales because of physics research that uses the term, Also "quanta" plural of quantum with the same definition.

However, "quantum leap" is a very well-used term to denote a huge change in current thinking without any direct evolution in between like the jumping between discrete quantum states. The controversy with XP was mostly Windows owners and they didn't like XP's activation anti-piracy measure. Personally, I didn't like XP not because of activation, but because it was extremely buggy. Unavailable network printers, lost connections to NT4 servers, Office causing error messages regularly At first I was asking every users to report to me any problems they saw, but after a few weeks I just asked them to click "YES" on the window asking if they wanted to send a report of the crash to Microsoft.

XP was a complete piece of crap when released compared to Win2K. It took at least a year before XP. That just makes it even worse. All the time, Mac OS was looking amazing. Congrats Microsoft. Everybody was talking about how it was yet another crappy OS from Microsoft. Operating systems are UIs; they are not intended to be performance boosters. Their task is to deliver the information that you need in a timely, neat and conclusive manner.

As far as I hear, Windows 7 does this better than Vista as well as at least when it comes to the neat part XP. Try thinking of it in terms of a human body: we're all pretty much the same, but with some differences in component performance.

It all comes down to how the body is used and maintained. Aero exists as just a subsystem in Vista, and you don't need anything but the command line for Unix. Operating systems exist so that the applications I use can be run on the hardware I own. That's really it. Operating systems are UI's? No they aren't. They are operating systems. The OS is several layers below anything that needs to draw on the screen, always has been, still is.

To make your OS boot even depend on there being graphics hardware is just a ludicrous assertion. This sort of thinking only leads to the statements I hear along the lines of "Oh, it looks different, it must work much better. You really can't beat some of the old, light weight OSes for speed. DOS will probably give you the best app performance you'll ever get. Because DOS doesn't do anything. DOS will load your program and then get the hell out of the way unless you specifically place a call to one of its few services.

It doesn't manage memory, it doesn't handle processes, it just does disk operations it's well named. For that very reason, you still see it used in embedded systems today. It loads up whatever app it is that. The downside, of course, being keeping ems, xms, qemu and what not straight; manually tweaking the load or. Vista is actually way more responsive than XP in most cases, it's the reaping every fraction of a percent of performance out of the system where Vista lacks, which is quite understandable given the responsiveness benefits Vista has.

Vista at work, XP at home. For me, the single biggest problem with Windows 7 gaming is the lack of PunkBuster support, as EvenBalance are refusing to support the beta at this stage.

Fair enough, it is their choice, however the beta is public, so many of their customers are in the same boat here. It seems sad that the public statements seem to indicate they are not even willing to look at it. It may not be supported, but at least PunkBuster works on 64 bit Win7, at last for come definitions of "work".

I used their update utility to install it, but still got kicked out of the game. Turned out the PB service didn't install properly or failed to start. Searching the net suggested that it's pretty much impossible to get PB to work on Win7, and especially the 64 bit version. However, randomly dicking around with c.

Developed by Primate Labs Inc. MSI Afterburner is a globally renowned overclocking software but not everyone knows that it also holds a prominent position in the list of best CPU benchmark software for Windows.

Moreover, it comes with some advanced features such as computer benchmarking , live video recording, etc. Unigine suite offers a complete solution for developers, businesses, and consumers.

The benchmarking comes under the consumer section. With this benchmarking software, you get real performance even under the maximum load. The PC benchmark test offers you in-depth details for better assessment. The company has offered unbiased results since It helps you in generating true-in game rendering workloads on various platforms like Windows, Mac, and Linux. If you are looking for a CPU benchmark test for free then also this software has covered you.

It offers both basic and advanced plans. In the basic plan, you can use its computer benchmark test for free while the advanced plan requires a subscription with a better option for benchmarking.

Now instead of looking for how to benchmark my PC, simply download the software and use it for effective benchmarking. And there we have it! Each of the aforementioned CPU benchmark software are the best in the market and you should surely take your pick from them soon. In sum, if you want to know about the efficiency or performance of your system , then you must try the benchmark software.

This sort of software will explain to you every bit about your system and issues as well which occurs because of the hardware issues. Along with it, ideal benchmark software will elucidate the methods on how to troubleshoot the issues too.

And, yeah, if we missed out on anything, please let us know in the comment section below. And, we assure you that we will make changes to our list to improve it a bit. See you soon, till then, stay in touch with us! User Comments: Add your comment to this article. You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. However, there is also a more powerful paid version that is capable of monitoring devices remotely and has an improved interface for power users.

It allows for up to 20 remote connections and comes with 2 years of free updates. Furthermore, you get some estimated frame rate performance figures for a selection of popular games provided by 3DMark, too. And of course, these benchmarks are going to be useful for anyone looking into overclocking their rig — plus 3DMark gives you the ability to stress test the stability of your overclock by running a looped benchmark over and over.

The software is built by a team of engineers as a passion project rather than a corporate offering. Apart from generating a slew of data alongside the net score of your hardware, it offers suggestions on how to improve performance. Every single hardware component is graded specifically based on its performance in the tests, allowing you to pinpoint exactly where your desktop is underperforming.

Users should keep in mind, however, that there are a lot of controversies involving this software. The team has repeatedly come under heavy criticism for personal attacks against tech journalists, while the benchmarks themselves have been accused of rigging the tests to put one hardware company in front of the other. It is particularly useful for high-end systems that scale beyond the purview of typical benchmarking software. The reports it generates are practical and based on real-world performance, dedicated to people involved in the content creation market.

It benchmarks your CPU through a variety of different tests, including a few that rely on newer applications like augmented reality and machine learning.