Melvin urofsky affirmative action on trial

Fadunmade rated it liked it May 22, David Bradley rated it really liked it Dec 22, Whit rated it liked it Jul 05, Fivewincs marked it as to-read Oct 02, Bruinrefugee added it Feb 15, Sean marked it as to-read Sep 01, Adrienne marked it as to-read Dec 12, Nicole marked it as to-read Jul 02, Taicheng Jin marked it as to-read Nov 18, Kevin marked it as to-read May 24, Ju Leigh marked it as to-read Sep 04, A marked it as to-read Sep 24, Jakob Wasserhoevel marked it as to-read Oct 14, Readingwomyn marked it as to-read Apr 16, Kris added it Jun 07, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.

Be the first to start one ». About Melvin I. Melvin I. Other books in the series. Students and teachers alike will cherish this book. Taking one case as his text, he presents the arguments on both sides, explores the societal setting that produced the controversy, and explains both the legal decisions that have been an important element in the debate and the steps the case followed in its journey to the Supreme Court.

He never forgets that the story he is telling involves real people, who spring to life in these pages and provide a human face to the debate and to the judicial process. He remembers that he is also writing for real people, and he does so beautifully. There could not be a better way of learning about the interaction between societal problems and the law in the United States.

Johnson v. Santa Clara involved two people who in competed for a dispatcher position with the transportation department of Santa Clara County, California. Paul Johnson had more experience and slightly higher test scores, but Diane Joyce was given the job based on affirmative action. An irate Johnson sued the county and won, only to have the decision reversed in appellate court.

Santa Clara will continue to guide and influence the debates both inside and outside the courtroom. Rich information stems from interviewing litigants and attorneys involved in Johnson , relevant case transcripts, and Justice Brennan's office files. Santa Clara addressed a variety of complicated and interrelated legal issues that surround the role and legality of affirmative action.

Through a strong narrative style, Urofsky not only provides the reader with a history of the litigation, but also makes the reader award that all legal decisions are built upon the lives of ordinary people. The result is a book that is an ideal primer on affirmative action, both as a contested political and legal issue and, as significantly, an emotional roller coaster for those caught up in it.

Urofsky skillfully weaves dialogue, novelistic narrative, and extensive interview quotes with discerning policy and legal analysis. In the grand tradition of Anthony Lewis, he shows how great movements in law and society impact ordinary people, and how their universal striving for fair play and equal treatment moves legal discourse.

Students and teachers alike will cherish this book. Wiecek , author of Liberty under Law: The Supreme Court in American Life "Urofsky's volume is a boon to those attempting to understand the current debate about affirmative action. Taking one case as his text, he presents the arguments on both sides, explores the societal setting that produced the controversy, and explains both the legal decisions that have been an important element in the debate and the steps the case followed in its journey to the Supreme Court.

He never forgets that the story he is telling involves real people, who spring to life in these pages and provide a human face to the debate and to the judicial process. He remembers that he is also writing for real people, and he does so beautifully. There could not be a better way of learning about the interaction between societal problems and the law in the United States.

Rich information stems from interviewing litigants and attorneys involved in Johnson , relevant case transcripts, and Justice Brennans office files. Editors' Preface Preface 1. Diane Joyce Makes a Phone Call 2. The Debate over Affirmative Action 3. The Law and Affirmative Action 4. An irate Johnson sued the county and won, only to have the decision reversed in appellate court. That reversal was subsequently upheld in the Supreme Court's decision, reaffirming that it was legitimate for employers to consider gender in hiring.

Preeminent legal historian Melvin Urofsky proves an exemplary guide through the complexities of this case as he takes us from the workplace through the various levels of our federal court system. Balancing the particulars of the case with an overview of constitutional law and judicial process, he creates a model legal history that is both appealing and enlightening for the non-scholar.

Urofsky is especially good at highlighting the fundamental human drama of this case and shows how Johnson and Joyce were simply ordinary people, each with valid reasons for their actions, but both ultimately caught up in legal and social issues that reached well beyond their own lives. Affirmative Action on Trial pointedly addresses the issue of sex discrimination and the broader controversy over the place of affirmative action in American society. The latter continues to generate headlines, like those that followed the Supreme Court decision to let stand a lower-court ruling that race cannot be used as a determination for admission to academic programs.

More recently, several states have even taken steps to end affirmative action altogether. While it's hard to tell how such actions will ultimately impact affirmative action, there's no question that the rulings in cases like Johnson v.